Tuesday, November 13, 2007
Go Big or Go Home on CF Free Agents
Happy Opening Day, everyone! Of course I'm not talking about the real Opening Day, rather Opening Day of the Hot Stove League. As we are 15 days out from the end of the World Series, teams can now officially talk to free agents.
To get me back into the blogging routine, I'm going to spend the next three postings running the numbers of those three player groups. Of course, a CF and a middle-of-the-order hitter aren't mutually exclusive, so don't expect so don't expect me be a stickler about that rule. Today, we'll focus on the CF free-agent candidates, and for kicks, I'll throw in the Nats' in-house CFs for comparison.
Most of the chart below is self-explanatory. For the statistically uninitiated, OPS is On-Base % + Slugging %; RZR is Revised Zone Rating; OOZ is Out of Zone Outs. Evaluating fielding statistics is still a developing art, but RZR and OOZ are two of the better ones, so I'll run with those for our purposes. Just remember to take them with a pinch of salt. H/T to FanGraphs for the Bill James projections, Chone Smith for the eponymous projections, and THT for the RZR and OOZ numbers.
So what kind of conclusions can we draw from this exercise?
This much is certain: Washington seeks any or all of the following: a middle-of-the-order slugger, a center fielder and a veteran starting pitcher to help provide stability to a young rotation.Not my words, rather those of Washington Times' Mark Zuckerman today. Sounds like a good offseason priority list to me.
To get me back into the blogging routine, I'm going to spend the next three postings running the numbers of those three player groups. Of course, a CF and a middle-of-the-order hitter aren't mutually exclusive, so don't expect so don't expect me be a stickler about that rule. Today, we'll focus on the CF free-agent candidates, and for kicks, I'll throw in the Nats' in-house CFs for comparison.
Most of the chart below is self-explanatory. For the statistically uninitiated, OPS is On-Base % + Slugging %; RZR is Revised Zone Rating; OOZ is Out of Zone Outs. Evaluating fielding statistics is still a developing art, but RZR and OOZ are two of the better ones, so I'll run with those for our purposes. Just remember to take them with a pinch of salt. H/T to FanGraphs for the Bill James projections, Chone Smith for the eponymous projections, and THT for the RZR and OOZ numbers.
| Name | Age (Opening Day 2008) | Bill James OPS (proj.) | Chone OPS (proj.) | Avg OPS | RZR (2007) | OOZ (2007) |
| Mike Cameron | 35 | .764 | .766 | .765 | .894 | 53 |
| Brady Clark | 34 | .715 | .725 | .720 | .840 | 5 |
| Jeff DaVanon | 34 | N/A | .689 | .689 | .861 | 5 |
| Darren Erstad | 33 | .685 | .685 | .685 | .896 | 19 |
| Steve Finley | 44 | N/A | .696 | .696 | .854 | 4 |
| Jerry Hairston, Jr. | 31 | .673 | .661 | .667 | .891 | 9 |
| Torii Hunter | 32 | .811 | .836 | .824 | .891 | 47 |
| Andruw Jones | 30 | .834 | .811 | .823 | .921 | 80 |
| Kenny Lofton | 40 | .718 | .735 | .727 | .667 | 0 |
| Corey Patterson | 28 | .733 | .707 | .720 | .949 | 46 |
| Curtis Pride | 39 | N/A | .588 | .588 | N/A | N/A |
| Aaron Rowand | 30 | .820 | .786 | .803 | .861 | 69 |
| Brad Wilkerson | 30 | .804 | .771 | .788 | N/A | N/A |
| Ryan Church | 29 | .815 | .764 | .790 | .912 | 14 |
| Nook Logan | 28 | .636 | .631 | .634 | .912 | 42 |
| Justin Maxwell | 25 | N/A | .615 | .615 | 1.000 | 1 |
So what kind of conclusions can we draw from this exercise?
- Nook Logan and Ryan Church are both a pretty good center fielders.
- Ryan Church is a decent bet to outperform some big-time free agent talent at the plate.
- Justin Maxwell may one day be the answer in center field, but it's waaaaay too soon to make that call definitively.
- Making a serious run at Andruw Jones makes sense.
This may seem obvious to most, but it took me looking at these numbers to accept just how well teh Nookster performed in the field. His range factor outperformed all the free agent CFs except for Andruw Jones and Corey Patterson and he tied Church. What is particularly interesting to me is that they both outperformed perennial Gold Glover Torii Hunter, at least by the limited metric of range factor. Nook actually had made Out of Zone outs on a more frequent basis than Hunter (once per 17 innings played at the position versus 1:27 for Hunter and 1:23 for Church), reinforcing the conclusion.
I'll caveat this statement by noting that I'm going by an average of only two projection systems; Bill James' and Chone. Other notable projection systems (PECOTA, Marcel, ZiPS) have yet to release their full 2008 data. That said, unless my averages change dramatically when the new data comes in, Church is projected to out-OPS all of the 2nd-tier CF free agent talent, including rumored Nats targets, Mike Cameron and Brad Wilkerson.
There's just not enough data to go on with Maxwell to say that he will be good enough to hold down a starting CF slot. Given the fact that he has less than two full seasons of minor league stats (none above high-A) I think it would be rash to think that he's legitimately in the picture for 2008 despite a nice little run when he got his cup o' joe in DC this year.
And finally...
Among the free agent center fielders, the only name that provides a significant upgrade at the position (admittedly, by the imperfect metrics I've laid out) is Andruw Jones. He had a better RZR and nearly doubled Hunter's OOZ numbers in only one less game. Despite his Boras-inflated value he could still be somewhat affordable thanks to this down 2007. While his .222/.311/.413 campaign this year was atrocious, he's still averaged .249/.341/.507 and nearly 40 HR per year over the past three seasons. Will be strike out a lot? Yes, but he'll also be a legitimate power bat who provides plus defense in center. Should the Nats lock themselves into a 5-year, $100 million deal to get him? I'm not ready to go THAT far. That said, Scott Boras' first and foremost concern is getting paid. Given his sub-par 2007, I doubt that anyone is going to throw stupid money at Jones so Boras could be flexible.
The ideal Jones signing in my mind would be a $16-17M one-year make-good type deal in the hopes of trading him for kids at the deadline or nabbing compensation picks when he walks. Given the relative lack of CF's on the farm that could make an impact soon (yes, even Maxwell), I wouldn't necessarily turn my nose up at a 3-year deal for Jones in the $45-48M range either.
What would really get my panties in a bunch would be if the Nats made a half-assed "well, we tried" offer to Jones and then gave a multi-year commitment to an overrated bat like Aaron Rowand or Mike Cameron to assuage the "need" for a "flashy" signing as the team enters the new park. If JimKast can't land Jones, there's really nothing wrong with putting Church in center and concentrating on getting one or two reliable (if not world-beating) innings sinks into the rotation.
In other words, go big or go home.